Wright v. Jessup

3 Duer 642
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMarch 25, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Duer 642 (Wright v. Jessup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Jessup, 3 Duer 642 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1854).

Opinion

[643]*643Motion on the part of the plaintiff for a commission, to England to examine, without naming them, such witnesses as might be produced before the commissioners.. It appeared that the case had been at issue for some months, and had several times been noticed for trial. Held, that the general rule, that the witnesses must be named in the commission, was never departed from, except under very special circumstances, and never when by reasonable diligence the names might have been ascertained. Here the laches in making the motion was not excused in the affidavit on which it was founded. The motion was therefore denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McColl v. Sun Mutual Insurance Co.
44 How. Pr. 452 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Duer 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-jessup-nysuperctnyc-1854.