Home/New York Supreme Court/Wright v. Haskin Wood Vulcanizing Co.

Wright v. Haskin Wood Vulcanizing Co.

27 N.Y.S. 1108, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 340, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 444
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 16, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 N.Y.S. 1108 (Wright v. Haskin Wood Vulcanizing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Haskin Wood Vulcanizing Co., 27 N.Y.S. 1108, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 340, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 444 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, and, under the settled practice, this brings up for review only exceptions. The exceptions relating to rulings upon evidence, which are three in number, upon examination we do not regard as tenable or in any way .affecting the verdict. The only exception, - other than those upon questions of evidence, is to the denial of the motion for a new trial, which brings up no question before us for review. The judgment appealed from therefore should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dexter v. Village of Fulton
33 N.Y.S. 901 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 N.Y.S. 1108, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 340, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-haskin-wood-vulcanizing-co-nysupct-1894.