Wright v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wright v. Hall

8 A.D.2d 827, 190 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8355

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 827 (Wright v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Hall, 8 A.D.2d 827, 190 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of fraudulent inducement to convey an interest in real property, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial before an Official Referee, in favor of respondent for $6,750. Judgment reversed, without costs, and a new trial granted. In our opinion, the proof adduced is insufficient to sustain the finding of fraud. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of fraudulent inducement to convey an interest in real property, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial before an Official Referee, in favor of respondent for $6,750. Judgment reversed, without costs, and a new trial granted. In our opinion, the proof adduced is insufficient to sustain the finding of fraud. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 827, 190 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-hall-nyappdiv-1959.