Wright v. Haley

Texas Supreme Court

Wright v. Haley

34 Tex. 48

DecidedJuly 1, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Tex. 48 (Wright v. Haley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Haley, 34 Tex. 48 (Tex. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Ogden, J.

The only assignment of errors in this cause is, “ That the court erred in refusing to quash the certiorari, and dismiss the cause, because the petition for certiorari failed to show such diligence on the part of the plaintiff as entitled him to the relief sought.” We think the petition showed all the diligence which, under the circumstances, could have been exercised, and upon the authority of Norris v. Rhodes, (25 Texas, 627.) we are of the opinion that he was entitled to the equitable relief sought. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogden, J.

The only assignment of errors in this cause is, “ That the court erred in refusing to quash the certiorari, and dismiss the cause, because the petition for certiorari failed to show such diligence on the part of the plaintiff as entitled him to the relief sought.” We think the petition showed all the diligence which, under the circumstances, could have been exercised, and upon the authority of Norris v. Rhodes, (25 Texas, 627.) we are of the opinion that he was entitled to the equitable relief sought. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Tex. 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-haley-tex-1871.