Wright v. Gray

20 Ala. 363
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 20 Ala. 363 (Wright v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Gray, 20 Ala. 363 (Ala. 1852).

Opinion

PHELAN, J.

The court below dismissed the certiorari, on the motion of the defendant, upon the ground that the petition was defective and insufficient; and this is assigned for error.

Upon looking into the petition, we find no cause or excuse set forth, why the plaintiff in error, who was also plaintiff below, did not appeal from the judgment of the justice of the peace against him; and for this reason, the prayer for a cer-tiorari should have been refused. But when a certiorari is awarded, even if it be upon a petition not setting forth such a state of facts as would properly justify its issuance, the Circuit Court, in pursuance of'the plain requirements of the statute, must proceed with the trial ck novo, without regarding the defects in the petition. The case of Casey v. Bryant, (1 Stew. & P. 51) is decisive of this case.

Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Kilborn
248 So. 2d 736 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1971)
Ex parte Snedden
65 So. 2d 214 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Guscott v. Roden & Co.
112 Ala. 632 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)
Wright v. Hurt
92 Ala. 591 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Grantham v. Payne
77 Ala. 584 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Washington v. Parker
60 Ala. 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ala. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-gray-ala-1852.