Wright v. General Motors Corp.

96 A.D.2d 510, 464 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19019
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 1983·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— In a personal injury action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered July 13, 1983, which denied their motion to reargue. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs claim that their motion was in fact a motion to renew. However, they concede that there were no new or additional facts presented in their moving papers since the record before Special Term on the prior motion contained their “additional facts”. Therefore, the motion was in fact a motion to reargue and no appeal lies from the denial of such a motion (see Klatz v Armor Elevator Co., 93 AD2d 633). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. General Motors Corp., 96 A.D.2d 510, 464 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 510 (Wright v. General Motors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawrence Development Corp. v. Jobin Waterproofing, Inc.
167 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Kartiganer Associates v. Town of New Windsor
132 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Zebrowski v. Trustees of Brookhaven
128 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Ginsberg v. Ginsberg
104 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Mader v. Mader
101 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Magliano v. Merckling
99 A.D.2d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)