Wright v. Forbes

1 How. Pr. 240
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 240 (Wright v. Forbes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Forbes, 1 How. Pr. 240 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Granted the motion with costs, on the ground that plaintiff’s attorney did not inform defendant’s attorney, that he had objections to receiving the amended plea and notice, until more than two months after he had received it, and in the mean time retained it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-forbes-nysupct-1845.