Wright v. Florida Department of Corrections and Sheila Szala
This text of Wright v. Florida Department of Corrections and Sheila Szala (Wright v. Florida Department of Corrections and Sheila Szala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-2140 _____________________________
WALTER LEE WRIGHT,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SHEILA SZALA,
Respondents. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
April 8, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024). ROWE, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Walter Lee Wright, pro se, Petitioner.
Marie A. Borland, Ethen R. Shapiro, and Jacob Z. Coates of Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent Sheila Szala.
No appearance for Respondent Florida Department of Corrections.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wright v. Florida Department of Corrections and Sheila Szala, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-florida-department-of-corrections-and-sheila-szala-fladistctapp-2026.