Wright v. Flemming

New York Supreme Court

Wright v. Flemming

25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 360

DecidedJuly 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 360 (Wright v. Flemming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Flemming, 25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 360 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Barnard, P. J.:

The defendants Flemming and Wright demurred to the complaint of plaintiffs. The demurrer was overruled at Special Term. Upon appeal to the General Term the order overruling the demurrer was reversed with costs. There was no formal judgment entered upon the order overruling the demurrer, but the appeal was taken from the order under section 349 of the late Code. This was a trial of an issue of law. The appeal, which was permitted from the order, did not change its character. Instead of entering a judgment and appealing from that, the Code permitted an appeal from the preliminary order. Upon the appeal iii the General Term the prevailing party was, under subdivision 5 of section 307, entitled to twenty dollars before argument and to forty dollars for argument. The excepted cases, in which such costs were not to be allowed, were cases mentioned in subdivisions 1, 3, 4 and 5 of section 349.

The appeal in the present case was under subdivision 2 of that section, and is, therefore, one of the cases in which the twenty dollars before argument and forty dollars for argument was allowed.

The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements, and an order granted that the clerk tax the rejected items.

Present — Barkard, P. J., and Gilbert, J.; DykmaN, J., not sitting.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and order granted that clerk tax disputed items.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnard, P. J.:

The defendants Flemming and Wright demurred to the complaint of plaintiffs. The demurrer was overruled at Special Term. Upon appeal to the General Term the order overruling the demurrer was reversed with costs. There was no formal judgment entered upon the order overruling the demurrer, but the appeal was taken from the order under section 349 of the late Code. This was a trial of an issue of law. The appeal, which was permitted from the order, did not change its character. Instead of entering a judgment and appealing from that, the Code permitted an appeal from the preliminary order. Upon the appeal iii the General Term the prevailing party was, under subdivision 5 of section 307, entitled to twenty dollars before argument and to forty dollars for argument. The excepted cases, in which such costs were not to be allowed, were cases mentioned in subdivisions 1, 3, 4 and 5 of section 349.

The appeal in the present case was under subdivision 2 of that section, and is, therefore, one of the cases in which the twenty dollars before argument and forty dollars for argument was allowed.

The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements, and an order granted that the clerk tax the rejected items.

Present — Barkard, P. J., and Gilbert, J.; DykmaN, J., not sitting.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and order granted that clerk tax disputed items.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-flemming-nysupct-1879.