Wright v. Finance Service Of Norwalk
This text of 996 F.2d 827 (Wright v. Finance Service Of Norwalk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
996 F.2d 827
Betty WRIGHT, Executrix of the Estate of Gladys Finch,
Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
FINANCE SERVICE OF NORWALK, INC., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 91-4156, 92-3004.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Sept. 15, 1993.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, and KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
996 F.2d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-finance-service-of-norwalk-ca6-1993.