Wright v. Dennis
This text of Wright v. Dennis (Wright v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6606
TRAVIS JERMAINE WRIGHT, a/k/a Travis J. Wright,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY DENNIS, Sheriff of Sumter County; DETECTIVE BURNISH, Sumter County Sheriff’s Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00299-RBH)
Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 5, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Jermaine Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Travis Jermaine Wright appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Dennis,
No. 8:07-cv-00299-RBH (D.S.C. March 26, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wright v. Dennis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-dennis-ca4-2008.