Wright v. Day

New York Court of Appeals

Wright v. Day

258 N.E.2d 221, 26 N.Y.2d 905, 309 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1453

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 8, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 N.E.2d 221 (Wright v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Day, 258 N.E.2d 221, 26 N.Y.2d 905, 309 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1453 (N.Y. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, on the ground that the record, as a matter of law, established that the plaintiffs had not deviated from their line of duty (Volunteer Firemen’s Benefit Law, § 5, subd. 1, par. i) and that their exclusive remedy is under the Volunteer Firemen’s Benefit Law (§ 19).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, on the ground that the record, as a matter of law, established that the plaintiffs had not deviated from their line of duty (Volunteer Firemen’s Benefit Law, § 5, subd. 1, par. i) and that their exclusive remedy is under the Volunteer Firemen’s Benefit Law (§ 19).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Gibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 N.E.2d 221, 26 N.Y.2d 905, 309 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-day-ny-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack