Wright v. Corporation of Georgetown

30 F. Cas. 676, 4 D.C. 534, 4 Cranch 534
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 15, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 F. Cas. 676 (Wright v. Corporation of Georgetown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Corporation of Georgetown, 30 F. Cas. 676, 4 D.C. 534, 4 Cranch 534 (circtddc 1835).

Opinion

The'-CouRT

(Thruston, J. contra,)

was of opinion, and instructed the jury that the inquisition, and the proceedings thereon, were no bar to the plaintiff’s action:

1. Because the compensation should be ascertained before the defendants could lawfully raise the level of the street.

2. Because the power to regulate, given by the Act of 1805, applies only to the streets opened or extended by virtue of that act.

3. Because the inquest was not taken before any magistrate or officer.

4. Because it is not certified by the justice that he summoned the jurors.

5. Because he has not certified that the jurors were sworn by him, nor that they made an inquest; nor that the plaintiff had notice, &c.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $160.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Topeka v. Sells
48 Kan. 520 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 676, 4 D.C. 534, 4 Cranch 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-corporation-of-georgetown-circtddc-1835.