Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care, Inc.

445 F. App'x 632
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2011·No. No. 11-1028·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Debbie Wright appeals the district court’s orders striking Wright’s expert designation and dismissing her complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care, No. 3:10-cv-00034-JRS (E.D. Va. Nov. 2 & Dec. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care, Inc., 445 F. App'x 632 (4th Cir. 2011).

445 F. App'x 632 (Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moss v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 1007 (Supreme Court, 2012)