Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided October 8, 2019·No. 2:19-cv-00379·Unknown

Opinion

1 2

4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION 6 7 GERALD WRIGHT Civil No. 2:19-CV-379-BAT Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 ORDER Commissioner of the Social Security 10 Administration,

11 Defendant.

12 After considering the filings of the parties regarding this issue, it is hereby ORDERED that 13 attorney fees in the amount of $2,900.35 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 14 2412(d) (EAJA), subject to any offset as described in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 15 If the EAJA fees are not subject to an offset as described in Ratliff, the check for EAJA 16 fees shall be made payable to Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment 17 of this fee to his attorney. The check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel at Dellert 18 Baird Law Offices, PLLC, 2805 Bridgeport Way W, #23, University Place, WA, 98466. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated this 8th day of October, 2019. 21 A 22 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA Chief United States Magistrate Judge 23

24 1 Presented by: 2 CHRISTOPHER H. DELLERT, WA #42453 3 Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC 2805 Bridgeport Way W, #23 4 University Place, WA 98466 Phone: (360) 329-6968 5 Fax: (360) 824-9371 Email: dellert.law.office@gmail.com 6 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2019).

Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security (Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)