Wright v. Claus
720 N.W.2d 304, 476 Mich. 868
Opinion
Philip L. WRIGHT, Pamela G. Wright, and Carl E. Welmers, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Timothy H. CLAUS, James G. Nihems, Jr., and Pro-Med Delivery, Inc., Defendants, and
Send Delivery, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*305 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. Claus, 720 N.W.2d 304, 476 Mich. 868 (Mich. 2006).
720 N.W.2d 304 (Wright v. Claus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.