Wright v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

Wright v. Clark

7 Ohio Law. Abs. 29

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 19, 1928

DocketNo. 21080

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ohio Law. Abs. 29 (Wright v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Clark, 7 Ohio Law. Abs. 29 (Ohio 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.

OFFICE & OFFICERS.

(400 E) The engineer of a city or village is an officer within the meaning and intent of Section' 3808, General Code, and therefore inhibited from becoming interested in the expenditures of money \of the corporation other than payment of his fixed compensation.

Sections 4364 and 4366, General Code, create the office of engineer of a municipality and define the powers and duties of of such office.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS.

' (360 S2) Neither fraud, nor conspiracy, nor unreasonable profits, are necessary for recovery of money from an-officer of a city or village, under the provisions of Section 3808, General Code.

Day, Allen, ¡Kinkade and Jones, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI