Wright v. City of Muskegon

103 N.W. 558, 140 Mich. 215, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 546
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 12, 1905·No. Docket No. 117·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Grant, J.

{after stating the facts). The defendant city exercised no supervision or control over the construction of this walk. It was done entirely by the board of supervisors under a contract with which the city had nothing to do. The precise question was raised in Thompson v. City of West Bay City, 137 Mich. 94, and decided against the plaintiff’s contention. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasoning of that case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Moore, C. J., and Blair, Montgomery, and Ostrander, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. City of Muskegon, 103 N.W. 558, 140 Mich. 215, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 546 (Mich. 1905).

103 N.W. 558 (Wright v. City of Muskegon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonneville v. City of Alpena
122 N.W. 618 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)