Wright v. City of Muskegon

Michigan Supreme Court

Wright v. City of Muskegon

103 N.W. 558, 140 Mich. 215, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 546

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 12, 1905

DocketDocket No. 117

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 N.W. 558 (Wright v. City of Muskegon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. City of Muskegon, 103 N.W. 558, 140 Mich. 215, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 546 (Mich. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Grant, J.

{after stating the facts). The defendant city exercised no supervision or control over the construction of this walk. It was done entirely by the board of supervisors under a contract with which the city had nothing to do. The precise question was raised in Thompson v. City of West Bay City, 137 Mich. 94, and decided against the plaintiff’s contention. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasoning of that case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Moore, C. J., and Blair, Montgomery, and Ostrander, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

{after stating the facts). The defendant city exercised no supervision or control over the construction of this walk. It was done entirely by the board of supervisors under a contract with which the city had nothing to do. The precise question was raised in Thompson v. City of West Bay City, 137 Mich. 94, and decided against the plaintiff’s contention. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasoning of that case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Moore, C. J., and Blair, Montgomery, and Ostrander, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 N.W. 558, 140 Mich. 215, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-city-of-muskegon-mich-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack