Wright v. City of Goldsboro Police Dept.
Opinion
Plaintiff did not appear for the November 17, 2009 pretrial conference. In an Order dated December 2, 2009, Deputy Commissioner Gheen dismissed Plaintiff's claim for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff filed his Form T-44 and an accompanying letter on June 18, 2010. In those *Page 2 documents, Plaintiff indicates that he has been incarcerated since June 8, 2008 and that it was for this reason that he failed to appear for the November 17, 2009 pretrial conference.
The undersigned find Plaintiff's explanation credible and are of the opinion that Deputy Commissioner Gheen's December 2, 2009 order of dismissal should be, and is hereby VACATED.
Accordingly, the case is hereby REMANDED to the Deputy Commissioner for initial hearing on the merits and presentation of evidence before a Deputy Commissioner.
This the 13th day of December, 2010.
S/_____________ LINDA CHEATHAM COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
*Page 1S/______________ PAMELA T. YOUNG CHAIR
S/________________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. City of Goldsboro Police Dept. (Wright v. City of Goldsboro Police Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.