Wright v. Bratton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wright v. Bratton

244 A.D.2d 183, 664 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11380

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 183 (Wright v. Bratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Bratton, 244 A.D.2d 183, 664 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated September 29, 1995, which found petitioner guilty of wrongfully striking a handcuffed prisoner and imposed a penalty of forfeiture of 10 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Carol Arber, J.], entered July 23, 1996), dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner wrongfully struck a handcuffed prisoner is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230-232). Issues relating to the witnesses’ credibility were for respondents to resolve (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated September 29, 1995, which found petitioner guilty of wrongfully striking a handcuffed prisoner and imposed a penalty of forfeiture of 10 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Carol Arber, J.], entered July 23, 1996), dismissed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner wrongfully struck a handcuffed prisoner is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 230-232). Issues relating to the witnesses’ credibility were for respondents to resolve (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 183, 664 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-bratton-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack