Wright v. Branch

143 So. 3d 492, 2014 WL 3805750, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11915
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 2014
DocketNo. 1D14-3044
StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 3d 492 (Wright v. Branch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Branch, 143 So. 3d 492, 2014 WL 3805750, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11915 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order denying his motion to stay discovery. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he will be irreparably harmed by the order denying stay as the order does not compel discovery. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 So. 3d 492, 2014 WL 3805750, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-branch-fladistctapp-2014.