Wright v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wright v. Board of Education

109 A.D.2d 648, 487 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 648 (Wright v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Board of Education, 109 A.D.2d 648, 487 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dorothy E. Kent, J.), entered on June 24, 1983, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Judith Patrice Wright, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $750,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Bloom and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dorothy E. Kent, J.), entered on June 24, 1983, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Judith Patrice Wright, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $750,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Bloom and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 648, 487 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1985.