Wright v. Black
2 Wend. 258
This text of 2 Wend. 258 (Wright v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wright v. Black, 2 Wend. 258 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).
Opinion
The attachment must go ; the absence of the plaintiff cannot be considered temporary, and the attorney must pay to the full amount allowed by the 14th rule of January term, 1799, which is explicit on this subject.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moncrief v. . Ross
50 N.Y. 431 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Dyer v. Montieth
1 Mich. N.P. 125 (Circuit Court of the 48th Circuit of Michigan, 1870)
Burrill v. Jewett
2 Rob. 701 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1864)
Roberti v. Methodist Book Concern
1 Daly 3 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1859)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Wend. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-black-nysupct-1829.