Wright v. Black
176 F. 1023, 100 C.C.A. 670, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4327
This text of 176 F. 1023 (Wright v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wright v. Black, 176 F. 1023, 100 C.C.A. 670, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4327 (4th Cir. 1910).
Opinion
This was an action in assumpsit to recover compensation for personal services. It involved questions of fact that seem to us to have been fairly submitted to the jury, and a careful examination of the record and of the printed arguments submitted fails to satisfy us that any reversible errors were committed on the trial. The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 F. 1023, 100 C.C.A. 670, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-black-ca4-1910.