Wright v. Berger

114 N.Y.S. 912
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 5, 1909·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff claims that the defendant sold to his assignor 200 shares of stock at $2.50 per share, and that at the time of the sale the defendant agreed that the plaintiff’s assignor should not lose by the purchase, and that if he held it for a year the defendant would repurchase it at the same price. The year expired February 16, 1908. There was no evidence of a tender of the stock to the defendant at the expiration of the year, or within a reasonable time thereafter. The plaintiff contends that tender was waived by the statement of the defendant made in July, 1908. This statement was made too late to enable the plaintiff to recover upon the theory that tender was waived.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. A.11 concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Berger, 114 N.Y.S. 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

114 N.Y.S. 912 (Wright v. Berger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beverly v. Richards
238 N.W. 270 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)
Lyons v. Snider
161 N.W. 532 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1917)