Wright v. Bearden

517 F. App'x 151
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2013·No. No. 12-7995·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Allen Wright appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, denying his motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions. Limiting our review to the issues [152] raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district court’s orders. Wright v. Bearden, No. 1:11-cv-03807-TLW (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2012; dated Nov. 2, 2012, entered Nov. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Bearden, 517 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2013).

517 F. App'x 151 (Wright v. Bearden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related