Wright v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC.
983 A.2d 730, 603 Pa. 696
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 28, 2009
Docket33 EAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 983 A.2d 730 (Wright v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wright v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., 983 A.2d 730, 603 Pa. 696 (Pa. 2009).
Opinion
THERESA WRIGHT, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND WRIGHT AND IN HER OWN RIGHT
v.
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., ASTEN GROUP, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON INC., BORWARNER CORP., CERTAIN-TEED CORP., CHRYSLER CORP., CRANE CO., CRANE PACKING, CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC., FORD MOTOR CO., FOSTER WHEELER CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GOULD PUMPS, INC., GREEN TWEED & CO., INC., HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., NOSROC CORP., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PARS MANUFACTURING CO., PECORA CORP., PEP BOYS, RAPID AMERICAN CORP., RILEY STOKER CORP., SELBY BATTERSBY, UNION CARBIDE CORP., WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., WEIL McLAIN CO.
PETITION OF: ASTEN JOHNSON, INC.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED, and Petitioner's Application for Stay is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ruspi v. Glatz
69 A.3d 680 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
983 A.2d 730, 603 Pa. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-allied-signal-inc-pa-2009.