Wright v. Allen

16 Ind. 284, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 136
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 1861·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case falls within Powers v. Talbott, 11 Inch 1, and is affirmed on the authority of that case. See Black v. Mitchell, 14 Ind. 397, for qualifications of the rule in Powers v. Talbott, supra; Morrison & Newby v. Weaver et al., at this term. The rule is, that where an assignee takes a note, upon the representation of the maker that it will be paid, or is good, upon which representation the purchaser of the note rightfully relies, the maker is estopped to defend against the payment of the note.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Allen, 16 Ind. 284, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 136 (Ind. 1861).

16 Ind. 284 (Wright v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krathwohl v. Dawson
38 N.E. 467 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Plummer v. Farmers Bank
90 Ind. 386 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Rose v. Hurley
39 Ind. 77 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)