Wright v. Albany Port District Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Wright v. Albany Port District Commission

35 N.E.2d 920, 286 N.Y. 566, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2105

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. Albany Port District Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 280 N.Y. 731 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1941·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur' granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

“ A question under the New York State Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon. The appellant contended that chapter 192 of the Laws of 1925 of the State of New York and the acts amendatory thereto were repugnant to the provisions of article 1, section 6; article 8, section 10; article 10, section 2; and article 12, section 2 of the Constitution of the State of New York of 1894. This court held that the laws in question were not repugnant to such constitutional provisions.” (See 280 N. Y. 731.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur' granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

“ A question under the New York State Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon. The appellant contended that chapter 192 of the Laws of 1925 of the State of New York and the acts amendatory thereto were repugnant to the provisions of article 1, section 6; article 8, section 10; article 10, section 2; and article 12, section 2 of the Constitution of the State of New York of 1894. This court held that the laws in question were not repugnant to such constitutional provisions.” (See 280 N. Y. 731.)

Wright v. Albany Port District Commission, 35 N.E.2d 920, 286 N.Y. 566, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2105 (N.Y. 1941).

Pincite

35 N.E.2d 920 (Wright v. Albany Port District Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.