Wright v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad

103 S.E. 95, 25 Ga. App. 256, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 718
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 5, 1920
Docket10500
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 95 (Wright v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad, 103 S.E. 95, 25 Ga. App. 256, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 718 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Smith, J.

1.(1)“ The act of the General Assembly approved August 15, 1914 (Acts 1914, p. 246), entitled ‘ An act to create a board of commissioners of roads and revenues for the County of Dade; to provide for the selection of said commissioners who shall constitute the board;' to prescribe their terms of office, their duties, fix their salaries, and for other purposes,’ confers upon the board of commissioners of roads and reve[257]*257núes the exclusive power, theretofore exercised by the ordinary, to levy, a tax for the maintenance of the public roads of Dade county. See Rawls County v. U. S., 150 U. S. 733 (26 L. ed. 1220); Pennington v. Gammon, 67 Ga. 456; Garrison v. Perkins, 137 Ga. 751, 752 (74 S. E. 541); Mathews v. Hussey, 148 Ga. 526 (97 S. E. 437).” (2) “A county, after having adopted the alternative road law as embodied in the Civil •Code (1910), §§ 694 et seq., and after having levied the maximum rate of four dollars per thousand for the maintenance of the public roads of the county, cannot levy an additional or special tax for that purpose. See Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Meriwether County, 148 Ga. 423 (96 S. E. 884).” Wright v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co., 150 Ga. 140 (103 S. E. 95).

Decided May 5, 1920. Affidavit of illegality; from Dade superior court — Judge Tarver. March 17, 1919. Martin G. Smith, for plaintiff. Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, S. J. Hale, for defendant.

2. In response to questions certified by this court, the Supreme Court answered as appears above; and since the rulings there made control the decision of this case, the trial judge did not err in sustaining the affidavit of illegality and dismissing the levy.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. Owen
224 S.E.2d 497 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Lance v. Crane
104 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
DL STOKES & CO., INC. v. McCoy
90 S.E.2d 404 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
DL STOKES & CO., INC. v. McCoy
88 S.E.2d 802 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 95, 25 Ga. App. 256, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-alabama-great-southern-railroad-gactapp-1920.