Wright v. Adams Express Co.
79 A. 760, 230 Pa. 635, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 662
Opinion
A difference in the facts gave rise in each of these cases to questions of minor importance not found in the others, but on the main question on which the appeals were allowed and to which the arguments were confined, they are alike. The judgment of the Superior Court in each case is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Henderson in Wright v. Adams Express Co., 43 Pa. Superior Ct. 40.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. Adams Express Co., 79 A. 760, 230 Pa. 635, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 662 (Pa. 1911).
79 A. 760 (Wright v. Adams Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paramount Dress Co. v. Kirby & Kirby, Inc.
76 A.2d 432 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Villari v. James
38 A.2d 379 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Brush v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.
138 A. 860 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
State v. Risty
213 N.W. 952 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Ensign v. Union Transfer Co.
88 Pa. Super. 26 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Dodge v. Adams Express Co.
54 Pa. Super. 422 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Windolph v. Adams Express Co.
48 Pa. Super. 304 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Howard v. American Express Co.
47 Pa. Super. 416 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)