Wright Mercantile & Lumber Co. v. Eton Mercantile Co.

84 S.E. 442, 143 Ga. 192, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 347
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 12, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 S.E. 442 (Wright Mercantile & Lumber Co. v. Eton Mercantile Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright Mercantile & Lumber Co. v. Eton Mercantile Co., 84 S.E. 442, 143 Ga. 192, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 347 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. An attachment which has never been levied is not such a pending suit as may be pleaded in abatement to a subsequent action in personam.

2. The voluntary abandonment of an attachment which had never been - levied, and the subsequent bringing of an action in personam, without payment of the magistrate’s costs in issuing the attachment or making affidavit of inability to pay such costs, was not ground for abating the latter suit under Civil Code (1910), §§ 5625, 5626.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reynolds v. Reynolds
112 S.E. 470 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.E. 442, 143 Ga. 192, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-mercantile-lumber-co-v-eton-mercantile-co-ga-1915.