Wright, Finley
This text of Wright, Finley (Wright, Finley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PD-0284-15 PD-0284-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 3/18/2015 11:42:04 AM ABEL ACOSTA NO. 01-13-00838-CR CLERK
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
FROM THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FINLEY WRIGHT, APPELLANT
VS.
STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TERRENCE GAISER LAWYER FOR APPELLANT (ON APPEAL ONLY) 2900 SMITH STREET, # 220 March 18, 2015 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006 SBOT# 07572500 713/ 225-0666 tagaiser@aol.com NO. 1334182
STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § VS. § HARRIS COUNTY,TEXAS § FINLEY WRIGHT § 174TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
NOW COMES FINLEY WRIGHT, appellant in the above-captioned
cause, by and through his attorney, TERRENCE GAISER, and files his
Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File Appellant’s Petition for
Discretionary Review; for which he would show:
1.) Appellant appeals from a judgment of guilt and forty year sentence for
the offense of aggravated sexual assault
2.) On February 12, 2015, a panel of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No.
01-13-00838-CR, Finley Wright v. State of Texas, issued a memorandum
opinion affirming appellant’s judgment. No motion for rehearing was filed..
Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due on Monday, March 16,
2015. This is the first requested extension. Appellant requests a thirty-day
extension to and including April 15, 2014.
3.) This extension is being sought for the following reasons:
After careful review of the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the transcript
of this case, in counsel’s professional opinion, further review of this case would be frivolous and without further merit. Counsel has informed
appellant of his right to seek discretionary review, pro se, of this cause and
will inform appellant of this request for extension.
4.) Counsel will file a motion to withdraw as attorney of record in the First
Court of Appeals and will inform appellant, by copy of that motion, and that
he has a right to object to the motion.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, appellant prays for an extension
of time to file appellant’s petition for discretionary review to and including
April 15, 2015.
Respectfully Submitted,
/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser TERRENCE GAISER LAWYER FOR APPELLANT 2900 SMITH STREET, STE. 220 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006 (713) 225-0666 SBN# 07572500 tagaiser@aol.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A PDR WAS SERVED ON ALL PARTIES ACCORDING TO THE RULES.
/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser TERRENCE GAISER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wright, Finley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-finley-texapp-2015.