Wright, Finley

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 18, 2015
DocketPD-0284-15
StatusPublished

This text of Wright, Finley (Wright, Finley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright, Finley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PD-0284-15 PD-0284-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 3/18/2015 11:42:04 AM ABEL ACOSTA NO. 01-13-00838-CR CLERK

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

FROM THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FINLEY WRIGHT, APPELLANT

VS.

STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TERRENCE GAISER LAWYER FOR APPELLANT (ON APPEAL ONLY) 2900 SMITH STREET, # 220 March 18, 2015 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006 SBOT# 07572500 713/ 225-0666 tagaiser@aol.com NO. 1334182

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § VS. § HARRIS COUNTY,TEXAS § FINLEY WRIGHT § 174TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

NOW COMES FINLEY WRIGHT, appellant in the above-captioned

cause, by and through his attorney, TERRENCE GAISER, and files his

Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File Appellant’s Petition for

Discretionary Review; for which he would show:

1.) Appellant appeals from a judgment of guilt and forty year sentence for

the offense of aggravated sexual assault

2.) On February 12, 2015, a panel of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No.

01-13-00838-CR, Finley Wright v. State of Texas, issued a memorandum

opinion affirming appellant’s judgment. No motion for rehearing was filed..

Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due on Monday, March 16,

2015. This is the first requested extension. Appellant requests a thirty-day

extension to and including April 15, 2014.

3.) This extension is being sought for the following reasons:

After careful review of the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the transcript

of this case, in counsel’s professional opinion, further review of this case would be frivolous and without further merit. Counsel has informed

appellant of his right to seek discretionary review, pro se, of this cause and

will inform appellant of this request for extension.

4.) Counsel will file a motion to withdraw as attorney of record in the First

Court of Appeals and will inform appellant, by copy of that motion, and that

he has a right to object to the motion.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, appellant prays for an extension

of time to file appellant’s petition for discretionary review to and including

April 15, 2015.

Respectfully Submitted,

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser TERRENCE GAISER LAWYER FOR APPELLANT 2900 SMITH STREET, STE. 220 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77006 (713) 225-0666 SBN# 07572500 tagaiser@aol.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A PDR WAS SERVED ON ALL PARTIES ACCORDING TO THE RULES.

/S/ Terrence A. Gaiser TERRENCE GAISER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wright, Finley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-finley-texapp-2015.