Wright, Ex Parte Susan Lucille

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 28, 2009
DocketAP-76,245
StatusPublished

This text of Wright, Ex Parte Susan Lucille (Wright, Ex Parte Susan Lucille) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright, Ex Parte Susan Lucille, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. AP-76,245




EX PARTE SUSAN LUCILLE WRIGHT, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 937134-A IN THE 263RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY




           Per curiam.

O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed her conviction. Wright v. State, 178 S.W.3d 905 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet ref’d).

            Applicant contends counsel rendered ineffective assistance in the guilt phase, in the punishment phase, and during the hearing on the motion for a new trial.

            Based on the trial judge’s findings pronounced in open court and our own review of the record, we find that counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the punishment phase of trial. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

            Relief is granted in part. The judgment of conviction in Case No. 937134-A from the 263rd Judicial District Court of Harris County is set aside, and the Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County so that a new punishment trial can be conducted.

            We decline to adopt the trial judge’s written findings of fact and conclusions of law because either they are not supported by the record or they are contrary to the law.

            Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: October 28, 2009

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Wright v. State
178 S.W.3d 905 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wright, Ex Parte Susan Lucille, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-ex-parte-susan-lucille-texcrimapp-2009.