Wren v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wren v. State

504 S.W.3d 748, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2016 WL 4525455

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 30, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103130

StatusPublished

This text of 504 S.W.3d 748 (Wren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wren v. State, 504 S.W.3d 748, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2016 WL 4525455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrance Wren appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b),

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrance Wren appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b),

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 748, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2016 WL 4525455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wren-v-state-moctapp-2016.