Wren v. Followell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Wren v. Followell

52 Ark. 76

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Statute of Limitations: trusts. The appellant held the land in controversy in trust for the appellee, and relies upon the statute of limitations as a defense to the appellee’s action to recover possession; but as there is no fact set forth in the abstract from which we can infer a disclaimer of the trust, there is nothing to show that the statute was ever set in motion.

The judgment of recovery will be affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Statute of Limitations: trusts. The appellant held the land in controversy in trust for the appellee, and relies upon the statute of limitations as a defense to the appellee’s action to recover possession; but as there is no fact set forth in the abstract from which we can infer a disclaimer of the trust, there is nothing to show that the statute was ever set in motion.

The judgment of recovery will be affirmed

Wren v. Followell, 52 Ark. 76 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

52 Ark. 76 (Wren v. Followell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related