Wray v. Tammany

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wray v. Tammany

13 Pa. 394

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 15, 1850

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 13 Pa. 394 (Wray v. Tammany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wray v. Tammany, 13 Pa. 394 (Pa. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

An attachment under the act of 1836, is pro[396]*396cess to enforce the judgment; and it is, in substance, if not in form, an execution. It differs from a fieri facias essentially only in this, that it reaches effects, from which the debt could otherwise not be levied. It is usually called an attachment execution; but whatever the name, it is within the spirit and purview of the statute.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

An attachment under the act of 1836, is pro[396]*396cess to enforce the judgment; and it is, in substance, if not in form, an execution. It differs from a fieri facias essentially only in this, that it reaches effects, from which the debt could otherwise not be levied. It is usually called an attachment execution; but whatever the name, it is within the spirit and purview of the statute.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Pa. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wray-v-tammany-pa-1850.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack