Wray v. Riley

District of Columbia

Wray v. Riley

1 D.C. 361

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 361 (Wray v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wray v. Riley, 1 D.C. 361 (D.D.C. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

The action was debt on a judgment recovered in the State of Georgia.

Mr. E. J. Lee. The case of judgment is not provided for by the Virginia statute of 12lh December, 1792, p. 78, in which, bail may be required by an indorsement of an attorney. Ruffin v. Call, 2 Wash. 181; Bidleson v. Whytel, 3 Burr. 1548; Belither v. Gibbs, 4 Burr. 2117 ; Bowen v. Barnett, Sayer’s Rep. 160.

Exoneretur ordered.

(Duckett, J., absent.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action was debt on a judgment recovered in the State of Georgia.

Mr. E. J. Lee. The case of judgment is not provided for by the Virginia statute of 12lh December, 1792, p. 78, in which, bail may be required by an indorsement of an attorney. Ruffin v. Call, 2 Wash. 181; Bidleson v. Whytel, 3 Burr. 1548; Belither v. Gibbs, 4 Burr. 2117 ; Bowen v. Barnett, Sayer’s Rep. 160.

Exoneretur ordered.

(Duckett, J., absent.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wray-v-riley-dcd-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack