Wray v. Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wray v. Harrell

927 So. 2d 171, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6165, 2006 WL 1112721

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 2006·No. No. 1D05-4674·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2005), instead of section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005). The injunction is nevertheless supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we AFFIRM, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek modification from the trial court.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2005), instead of section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005). The injunction is nevertheless supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we AFFIRM, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek modification from the trial court.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., Concur.

Wray v. Harrell, 927 So. 2d 171, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6165, 2006 WL 1112721 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

927 So. 2d 171 (Wray v. Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related