Wray v. Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wray v. Harrell

927 So. 2d 171, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6165, 2006 WL 1112721

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 28, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-4674

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 927 So. 2d 171 (Wray v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wray v. Harrell, 927 So. 2d 171, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6165, 2006 WL 1112721 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2005), instead of section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005). The injunction is nevertheless supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we AFFIRM, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek modification from the trial court.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2005), instead of section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005). The injunction is nevertheless supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we AFFIRM, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek modification from the trial court.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

927 So. 2d 171, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6165, 2006 WL 1112721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wray-v-harrell-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack