Wray v. Guyan Lumber Co.
This text of 133 S.E. 315 (Wray v. Guyan Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lester G. Toney instituted this action in trespass on the case against the defendant, Guyan Lumber Company, a corporation, for the wrongful cutting and removing of timber. The present plaintiff, W. S. Wray, claiming the benefit of the cause of action as assignee of Toney, thereafter, over the objection of the defendant, was substituted as plaintiff in lieu of Toney. To the judgment of the trial court upon a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff obtained this writ.
Wray cannot maintain the action in his own name as as-signee of the original plaintiff, Toney, and the trial court improperly permitted him to be substituted as plaintiff in lieu of Toney. “While a claim arising out of a tort to real or personal property is assignable, the assignee cannot, under Section 14, Chapter 99, Code, or at common law, maintain an action thereon in his own name. Such action may be maintained in the name of the assignor for the use of the assignee.” Barkers Creek Coal Co. v. Alpha Pocahontas Coal Co., 96 W. Va. 700, 123 S. E. 803; Keyser Canning Co. v. Klots Throwing Co., 98 W. Va. 487, 128 S. E. 280.
In view of the fact that the substituted plaintiff, W. S. Wray, cannot maintain the action in his own name, it is unnecessary to consider the questions raised on the merits of the case.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, without prejudice to the rights of the parties.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 S.E. 315, 101 W. Va. 619, 1926 W. Va. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wray-v-guyan-lumber-co-wva-1926.