Wragg v. Cattel of Skene

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Wragg v. Cattel of Skene

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 410

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 1, 1747

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 410 (Wragg v. Cattel of Skene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wragg v. Cattel of Skene, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 410 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1747).

Pincite

Opinion

This Cause upon Bill and Answer being opened by Mr. Wright of Counsel for the Complainant, It was prayed That the Equity of Redemption might be foreclosed as to the Six Negroes named Francis Abel Obadiah, Rachel Hannah and Affee in the Bill mentioned, Which not being opposed but agreed to by Mr. Freeman ¹⁶ of Counsel for the Defendant; It is Decreed accordingly [411]*411and Ordered That the Decree be drawn up at large with Costs to be allowed.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This Cause upon Bill and Answer being opened by Mr. Wright of Counsel for the Complainant, It was prayed That the Equity of Redemption might be foreclosed as to the Six Negroes named Francis Abel Obadiah, Rachel Hannah and Affee in the Bill mentioned, Which not being opposed but agreed to by Mr. Freeman ¹⁶ of Counsel for the Defendant; It is Decreed accordingly [411]*411and Ordered That the Decree be drawn up at large with Costs to be allowed.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register in Chancery

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wragg-v-cattel-of-skene-ctchansc-1747.