W.R. Hoy v. Borough of Cochranton
This text of W.R. Hoy v. Borough of Cochranton (W.R. Hoy v. Borough of Cochranton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
William R. Hoy, : Appellant : : No. 1005 C.D. 2015 v. : : Borough of Cochranton :
AMENDING ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2017, the first two sentences of the first full paragraph on page 20 in the above-matter, filed December 21, 2016, is amended to reflect the following correction:
Moreover, the evidence of record supports the reasons given by the Township [Borough] for choosing Beachy as uniquely qualified for the position and at least as qualified as Hoy in this regard. The Township [Borough] considered that Beachy had worked for the Borough’s police department as a Sergeant, temporarily served as its Chief of Police, had recommendations from a number of residents, acquired budget experience and experience with enforcement of local ordinances in the Township [Borough], was mentored by the Chief of Police and had his recommendation.
________________________________ PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
W.R. Hoy v. Borough of Cochranton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wr-hoy-v-borough-of-cochranton-pacommwct-2017.