W.R. Hoy v. Borough of Cochranton
Opinion
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
William R. Hoy, :
Appellant :
: No. 1005 C.D. 2015
v. :
:
Borough of Cochranton :
AMENDING ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2017, the first two sentences of the first full paragraph on page 20 in the above-matter, filed December 21, 2016, is amended to reflect the following correction:
Moreover, the evidence of record supports the reasons given by the Township [Borough] for choosing Beachy as uniquely qualified for the position and at least as qualified as Hoy in this regard. The Township [Borough] considered that Beachy had worked for the Borough’s police department as a Sergeant, temporarily served as its Chief of Police, had recommendations from a number of residents, acquired budget experience and experience with enforcement of local ordinances in the Township [Borough], was mentored by the Chief of Police and had his recommendation.
PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
W.R. Hoy v. Borough of Cochranton (W.R. Hoy v. Borough of Cochranton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.