W.R. Grace & Co. v. Multi Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
This text of 504 So. 2d 493 (W.R. Grace & Co. v. Multi Restaurant Concepts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling that enforcement of the contract would be unreasonable and unjust; that the forum designated in the contract was chosen because of the defendants’ overwhelming bargaining power; and that enforcement of the choice of forum clause would contravene the strong public policy of Texas, we affirm the trial court’s Order Denying Re-Stated Motion to Dismiss. Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437 (Fla.1986); Haws & Garrett General Contractors, Inc. v. Panhandle Custom Decorators & Supply, Inc., 500 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
504 So. 2d 493, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 843, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wr-grace-co-v-multi-restaurant-concepts-inc-fladistctapp-1987.