W.R. Grace & Co. v. Multi Restaurant Concepts, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

W.R. Grace & Co. v. Multi Restaurant Concepts, Inc.

504 So. 2d 493, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 843, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7377

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1987·No. No. 86-3159·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling that enforcement of the contract would be unreasonable and unjust; that the forum designated in the contract was chosen because of the defendants’ overwhelming bargaining power; and that enforcement of the choice of forum clause would contravene the strong public policy of Texas, we affirm the trial court’s Order Denying Re-Stated Motion to Dismiss. Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437 (Fla.1986); Haws & Garrett General Contractors, Inc. v. Panhandle Custom Decorators & Supply, Inc., 500 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling that enforcement of the contract would be unreasonable and unjust; that the forum designated in the contract was chosen because of the defendants’ overwhelming bargaining power; and that enforcement of the choice of forum clause would contravene the strong public policy of Texas, we affirm the trial court’s Order Denying Re-Stated Motion to Dismiss. Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437 (Fla.1986); Haws & Garrett General Contractors, Inc. v. Panhandle Custom Decorators & Supply, Inc., 500 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

W.R. Grace & Co. v. Multi Restaurant Concepts, Inc., 504 So. 2d 493, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 843, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7377 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

504 So. 2d 493 (W.R. Grace & Co. v. Multi Restaurant Concepts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related