Wpnt, Inc. v. Evergreen Media Corporation of Washington, D.C.
This text of 73 F.3d 367 (Wpnt, Inc. v. Evergreen Media Corporation of Washington, D.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73 F.3d 367
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
WPNT, INC., Appellee,
v.
EVERGREEN MEDIA CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C., Appellant.
No. 95-1329EM.
No. 95-1629EM.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.
Before FAGG, GARTH,* and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Evergreen Media Corporation of Washington, D.C. (Evergreen Media) appeals from an adverse jury verdict in this diversity action. Evergreen Media contends the district court committed error in excluding evidence Evergreen Media asserts was essential to its defense. Evergreen Media also contends the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's award.
We believe this case was well tried in the district court. We conclude, however, the issues do not warrant a comprehensive opinion. Having carefully considered the record, briefs, and parties' arguments, we find no reversible error of law and are satisfied the record supports the verdict. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The HONORABLE LEONARD I. GARTH, United States Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F.3d 367, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wpnt-inc-v-evergreen-media-corporation-of-washingt-ca8-1996.