W.O.W. Liquors Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

W.O.W. Liquors Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

109 A.D.2d 800, 486 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 800 (W.O.W. Liquors Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

W.O.W. Liquors Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 109 A.D.2d 800, 486 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority dated April 2, 1984 which, after a hearing, found that petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 111 in that it permitted one Clarence Callis to avail himself of its license and imposed a penalty of (1) license cancellation and (2) bond forfeiture of $1,000.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The State Liquor Authority’s determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). O’Connor, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority dated April 2, 1984 which, after a hearing, found that petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 111 in that it permitted one Clarence Callis to avail himself of its license and imposed a penalty of (1) license cancellation and (2) bond forfeiture of $1,000.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The State Liquor Authority’s determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). O’Connor, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 800, 486 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wow-liquors-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack