Woullard v. Bishop

755 So. 2d 816, 2000 WL 461369
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 2000·No. 1D99-3190·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

755 So.2d 816 (2000)

Dexter D. WOULLARD, Petitioner,
v.
K. BISHOP, Sgt. Gillard, C.W. Kirkland, et al., Respondents.

No. 1D99-3190.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 25, 2000.

*817 Dexter W. Woullard, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anthony W. Garcia, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review a trial court order by which his petition for a writ of mandamus was dismissed for his failure to comply with the indigency requirements of section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes. We grant the writ and quash the trial court's order because the trial court did not afford the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to comply with section 57.085 before dismissing his petition. See Gonzalez v. Moore, 743 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Masiello v. Moore, 739 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); compare Jackson v. Department of Corrections, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S549 (Fla. Nov. 18, 1999) (dismissing petition because petitioner did not comply with section 57.085(7) requirements after having been given more than one chance to do so).

The order of dismissal is accordingly quashed.

JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woullard v. Bishop, 755 So. 2d 816, 2000 WL 461369 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

755 So. 2d 816 (Woullard v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Childers v. McDonough
965 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Vega v. Kilhefner
931 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)