Woullard v. Bishop
This text of 755 So. 2d 816 (Woullard v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dexter D. WOULLARD, Petitioner,
v.
K. BISHOP, Sgt. Gillard, C.W. Kirkland, et al., Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*817 Dexter W. Woullard, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anthony W. Garcia, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review a trial court order by which his petition for a writ of mandamus was dismissed for his failure to comply with the indigency requirements of section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes. We grant the writ and quash the trial court's order because the trial court did not afford the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to comply with section 57.085 before dismissing his petition. See Gonzalez v. Moore, 743 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Masiello v. Moore, 739 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); compare Jackson v. Department of Corrections, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S549 (Fla. Nov. 18, 1999) (dismissing petition because petitioner did not comply with section 57.085(7) requirements after having been given more than one chance to do so).
The order of dismissal is accordingly quashed.
JOANOS, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
755 So. 2d 816, 2000 WL 461369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woullard-v-bishop-fladistctapp-2000.