Wottowa v. Ridgly

Appellate Court of Illinois

Wottowa v. Ridgly

202 Ill. App. 384

DecidedOctober 13, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 384 (Wottowa v. Ridgly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wottowa v. Ridgly, 202 Ill. App. 384 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Contracts, § 377*—when evidence of prior negotiations is admissible. Where only a part of a contract sued upon has been reduced to writing, evidence of the negotiations and facts occurring prior to the time of . the making of the contract is admissible in evidence. 7. Attachment, § 237*—when judgment proper on count not covered by affidavit. In an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered and for work and labor, in which a writ of attachment had been issued but no property levied on thereunder, where the general issue only was pleaded, held that a judgment including a recovery on the count for work and labor could be sustained, though the attachment affidavit" did not state that anything was due for work and labor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Contracts, § 377*—when evidence of prior negotiations is admissible. Where only a part of a contract sued upon has been reduced to writing, evidence of the negotiations and facts occurring prior to the time of . the making of the contract is admissible in evidence. 7. Attachment, § 237*—when judgment proper on count not covered by affidavit. In an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered and for work and labor, in which a writ of attachment had been issued but no property levied on thereunder, where the general issue only was pleaded, held that a judgment including a recovery on the count for work and labor could be sustained, though the attachment affidavit" did not state that anything was due for work and labor.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wottowa-v-ridgly-illappct-1916.