Woslager v. Union National Bank
This text of 234 N.W. 927 (Woslager v. Union National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment upon an instructed verdict for the defendant. A series of cases were brought against the defendant bank upon similar allegations.
The first of these cases to appear in this court was Myers v. Union Nat. Bank, 115 Neb. 49, where all of the facts are fully set out in an extended opinion by Judge George A. Day and the law applicable thereto is announced.
It is admitted that the issues and evidence in this case are substantially the same except as to the testimony of one witness relied upon to establish fraud. We are of the opinion that there is no substantial difference in the two cases.
The verdict was instructed by Judge Welch in the Myers case, and after hearing all the evidence in this case Judge Wright also instructed a verdict for the defendant bank. We are convinced that no other verdict than one for the appellee could have been sustained, and the judgment is hereby
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 N.W. 927, 120 Neb. 885, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woslager-v-union-national-bank-neb-1931.