WOSKOWICZ v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

WOSKOWICZ v. State

40 So. 3d 877, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10581, 2010 WL 2836342

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 2010

Docket3D08-3317

StatusPublished

This text of 40 So. 3d 877 (WOSKOWICZ v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WOSKOWICZ v. State, 40 So. 3d 877, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10581, 2010 WL 2836342 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 316.027(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008); Carrada v. State, 919 So.2d 592, 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that under section 316.027(l)(a), “the [Sjtate need only prove the actual existence of the accident and the victim’s injury, the defendant’s admitted knowledge that both occurred, and the admitted fact that he did not remain at the scene”) (citation omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 316.027(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008); Carrada v. State, 919 So.2d 592, 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that under section 316.027(l)(a), “the [Sjtate need only prove the actual existence of the accident and the victim’s injury, the defendant’s admitted knowledge that both occurred, and the admitted fact that he did not remain at the scene”) (citation omitted).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 So. 3d 877, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10581, 2010 WL 2836342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woskowicz-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack