Woska v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woska v. Murray

88 A.D.2d 974, 452 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17352

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.2d 974 (Woska v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woska v. Murray, 88 A.D.2d 974, 452 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Altimari, J.), entered November 18, 1981, which, upon respondent’s oral motion, set aside a jury verdict in the amount of $110,000 in favor of respondent as grossly inadequate, and ordered a new trial on the issue of [975]*975damages only, unless defendant stipulates to an increase of the damage award to $175,000. Order reversed, with costs, motion denied and verdict reinstated. The verdict was supported by the evidence adduced at trial and should not have been set aside. Mollen, P. J., Gulotta, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Altimari, J.), entered November 18, 1981, which, upon respondent’s oral motion, set aside a jury verdict in the amount of $110,000 in favor of respondent as grossly inadequate, and ordered a new trial on the issue of [975]*975damages only, unless defendant stipulates to an increase of the damage award to $175,000. Order reversed, with costs, motion denied and verdict reinstated. The verdict was supported by the evidence adduced at trial and should not have been set aside. Mollen, P. J., Gulotta, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 974, 452 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woska-v-murray-nyappdiv-1982.